CASE REPORT |
|
Year : 2022 | Volume
: 42
| Issue : 2 | Page : 98-100 |
|
Direct Bilirubin Level Greater than Total Bilirubin Level: A Bizarre Result Caused by Paraproteins in a Patient with Multiple Myeloma
Chi-Sheng Chen1, Ming-Shen Dai2, Bing-Heng Yang3
1 Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 2 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 3 Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital; Trace Element Research Center, Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital; Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Bing-Heng Yang Department of Pathology, Division of Clinical Pathology, 3F, No. 325, Sec. 2, Chenggong Road, Neihu, Taipei City 114 Taiwan
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_435_20
|
|
Paraproteins have been reported to cause interference in a sort of chemistry assays conducted by current automated chemistry analyzers. However, the nature of interference differs across different methodologies and reactions. Total bilirubin and direct bilirubin assays might yield spurious result when the sample contains excess amounts of paraproteins, which are neither reliable nor reproducible when repeated tests are applied once the interference occurs. Herein, we present the case of a 78-year-old female diagnosed with kappa light chain multiple myeloma with disease progression. On admission, she had acute hepatitis and a bizarre result with direct bilirubin level higher than total bilirubin level was noted. After further investigation, excess amounts of immunoglobulin G (IgG) were the most likely cause which led to the interference of direct bilirubin assay and caused unreliable results. This case highlights the significance of the fact that patients with excess IgG might have unreliable results of direct bilirubin assay which could mislead clinical judgment. Moreover, clinicians should be more careful and should base therapeutic decisions on the patient's clinical condition when faced with patients in a similar condition.
|
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|